Search Penny Hill Press

Monday, September 13, 2010

Copyright Protection for Fashion Design: A Legal Analysis of Legislative Proposals in the111th Congress

Brian T. Yeh
Legislative Attorney

Fashion design does not currently receive explicit protection under U.S. copyright law. Limited avenues for protection of certain types of apparel designs can be found through trademark and patent law, though proponents of copyright protection for fashion design argue that these limited means are insufficient. Legislation has been introduced in the 111th Congress, the Design Piracy Prohibition Act (H.R. 2196) and the Innovative Design Protection and Piracy Prevention Act (S. 3728), that would provide a three-year term of copyright protection for fashion designs. The bills resemble each other although contain differences. For example, for a fashion design to enjoy protection under H.R. 2196, the designer must register the design with the U.S. Copyright Office; S. 3728 contains no such registration requirement. Instead, protection arises under S. 3728 upon the design's creation, although the design must be a sufficiently "unique, distinguishable, nontrivial and non-utilitarian variation over prior designs for similar types of articles." This is a more restrictive definition of "fashion design" compared to H.R. 2196—thus, presumably, fewer fashion designs would qualify for protection under S. 3728 compared to H.R. 2196. 

Both bills would offer copyright protection for the appearance of an article of apparel as well as its ornamentation. They broadly define the term "apparel" to mean the following: clothing (including undergarments, outerwear, gloves, footwear, and headgear), handbags, purses, wallets, duffel bags, suitcases, tote bags, belts, and eyeglass frames. H.R. 2196 would deny protection to fashion design that had been embodied in a useful article that was made public by the designer in the United States or a foreign country more than six months before the date of the application for registration. In contrast, S. 3728 would deny protection if the design was made public prior to the enactment of the bill or more than three years before the date upon which protection of the design is asserted. H.R. 2196 would also require the Register of Copyrights to establish and maintain an electronically searchable database of protected fashion designs; such database must be made available to the public without a fee or other access charge. S. 3728 contains no similar provision. 

Both bills would prohibit the creation, importation, sale, or distribution of any article the design of which has been copied from a protected fashion design (or from an image of it), without the consent of the registered design owner. Such activity would be considered an infringement of the fashion design owner's rights, and the adjudged infringer would be subject to damages of the greater of: $250,000 or $5 per copy (under H.R. 2196) or $50,000 or $1 per copy (under S. 3728). H.R. 2196 provides several limitations on infringement liability: (1) if the allegedly infringing article is original and not closely and substantially similar in overall visual appearance to the protected design; (2) if the allegedly infringing article reflects a "trend" (defined by the bill as a newly popular concept or idea expressed in a wide variety of designs of apparel that are in immediate demand); or (3) if the allegedly infringing article is the result of independent creation. S. 3728's limitations on liability are slightly different: (1) if the allegedly infringing article is not "substantially identical" in overall visual appearance to the original elements of a protected design (that is, the article would not likely be mistaken for the protected design because the article contains non-trivial differences in construction or design); (2) if the article is the result of independent creation; or (3) if a person produces a single copy of a protected design for noncommercial personal use. In addition, both bills expressly state that an infringing article is not an illustration or picture of a protected design in an advertisement, book, periodical, newspaper, photograph, broadcast, motion picture, or similar medium. 

This report analyzes the legislative proposals to provide for fashion design protection. It also summarizes arguments both in favor of and against extending such protection.

Date of Report: September 3, 2010
Number of Pages: 13
Order Number: RS22685
Price: $29.95

Follow us on TWITTER at or #CRSreports

Document available via e-mail as a pdf file or in paper form.
To order, e-mail Penny Hill Press or call us at 301-253-0881. Provide a Visa, MasterCard, American Express, or Discover card number, expiration date, and name on the card. Indicate whether you want e-mail or postal delivery. Phone orders are preferred and receive priority processing.