Patricia Moloney Figliola
Specialist in Internet and Telecommunications Policy
In the early 1990s, Congress recognized that several federal agencies had ongoing highperformance computing programs, but no central coordinating body existed to ensure long-term coordination and planning. To provide such a framework, Congress passed the High-Performance Computing and Communications Program Act of 1991 (P.L. 102-194) to enhance the effectiveness of the various programs. In conjunction with the passage of the act, the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) released Grand Challenges: High- Performance Computing and Communications. That document outlined a research and development (R&D) strategy for high-performance computing and a framework for a multiagency program, the High-Performance Computing and Communications (HPCC) Program. The HPCC Program has evolved over time and is now called the Networking and Information Technology Research and Development (NITRD) Program, to better reflect its expanded mission.
Current concerns are the role of the federal government in supporting IT R&D and the level of funding to allot to it. Proponents of federal support of information technology (IT) R&D assert that it has produced positive outcomes for the country and played a crucial role in supporting long-term research into fundamental aspects of computing. Such fundamentals provide broad practical benefits, but generally take years to realize. Additionally, the unanticipated results of research are often as important as the anticipated results. Another aspect of government-funded IT research is that it often leads to open standards, something that many perceive as beneficial, encouraging deployment and further investment. Industry, on the other hand, is more inclined to invest in proprietary products and will diverge from a common standard when there is a potential competitive or financial advantage to do so. Proponents of government support believe that the outcomes achieved through the various funding programs create a synergistic environment in which both fundamental and application-driven research are conducted, benefitting government, industry, academia, and the public. Supporters also believe that such outcomes justify government’s role in funding IT R&D, as well as the growing budget for the NITRD Program. Critics assert that the government, through its funding mechanisms, may be picking “winners and losers” in technological development, a role more properly residing with the private sector. For example, the size of the NITRD Program may encourage industry to follow the government’s lead on research directions rather than selecting those directions itself.
The President’s FY2013 budget request for the NITRD Program is $3.808 billion, an increase of $69 million more than the $3.739 billion FY2012 estimate. FY2013 appropriations bills from the Senate and the House were not passed before the end of the 112th Congress. H.J.Res. 117, passed by the House on September 13, 2012, provides a framework for a six-month Continuing Resolution that began on October 1, 2013.
Three pieces of legislation were introduced in the 112th Congress that would have had an effect on the NITRD Program and its member agencies: H.R. 3834, the Advancing America’s Networking and Information Technology Research and Development Act of 2012; H.R. 2096, the Cybersecurity Enhancement Act of 2011; and S. 1152, also called the Cybersecurity Enhancement Act of 2011. H.R. 2096 and S. 1152 were identical. None of these bills became law.
Two hearings were held during the 112th Congress related to the NITRD Program, the first on federal R&D efforts to protect information in the digital age (May 25, 2011) and the second on program oversight (September 21, 2011).
Date of Report: January 30, 2013
Number of Pages: 16
Order Number: RL33586
Price: $29.95
To Order:
RL33586.pdf
to use the SECURE SHOPPING CART
e-mail congress@pennyhill.com
For email and phone orders, provide a Visa, MasterCard, American Express, or Discover card number, expiration date, and name on the card. Indicate whether you want e-mail or postal delivery. Phone orders are preferred and receive priority processing.
Posts
